The application security company that publishes its own limits.
We built our own platform to scan code, dependencies, cloud and containers. When a finding has to become a fix, our consultants take it from there. And when the real problem is headcount, we put one of our people inside your team.
The problem was never too few tools.
Here is one risk, the way four tools report it today.
- SCA
A critical CVE in a dependency.
Ticket one.
- CSPM
A container role with write access to production storage.
Ticket two.
- CSPM
A load balancer open to the internet.
Ticket three.
- GRC
Control A.8.9 reported as in place.
No ticket at all.
Together they are one path from a public IP address to your client data.
Each of those findings is correct. Each one, on its own, is unremarkable. Nothing in the stack draws the line between them, because drawing it means reading code, cloud and controls in the same query.
Neither do we, today, and this page will not pretend otherwise. What exists is the step before the path: the four findings land in the same table, the same flaw seen by two scanners becomes one finding with two sources, and the executive report comes out already drafted. The path is what gets built on top of that table.
What runs, and where it stops
One connection, and the scan covers the repository, the image, the infrastructure code and the machine.
What we do not do
White label does not exist
The report carries our brand in the header and footer of every page, not yours. Changing that takes a code change and a rebuild.
The report is a PDF
Not Word, not Excel. If your process ends in a file you open and edit before sending, it still will.
The platform is not live yet
Infrastructure is being rebuilt. There is no signup, no trial and no billing — and you pay for nothing before it exists.
Measured against your process today, not against a competitor
| Step | Your process today | With the platform |
|---|---|---|
| Reading four tool outputs | Four formats, opened one by one | SARIF, CycloneDX, Nessus XML and vendor CSV in one table |
| The same flaw seen by two scanners | Two findings, deduplicated by hand | One finding with two sources |
| Retest of an accepted finding | Reopens, because the line number moved | Identity ignores line numbers; the mark survives |
| Writing the executive report | From scratch, every time | Drafted; you review, correct and sign |
See what the platform does, and where it stops.
There is no signup and no trial to click. What exists today is a technical conversation with the person who wrote the code.